2007 Fiat Croma vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Fiat Croma (145 HP) has 77 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Fiat Croma has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan Pixo has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan Pixo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Fiat Croma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Fiat Croma | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Croma | Pixo |
Year Released | 2007 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 205 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.7 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2360 mm |