2007 Fiat Palio II vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2007 Fiat Palio II is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (213 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2007 Fiat Palio II. (68 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2007 Fiat Palio II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 515 kg more than 2007 Fiat Palio II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Fiat Palio II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Fiat Palio II | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Palio II | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1697 cc | 6550 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 213 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2960 mm |
