2007 Fiat Stilo vs. 2003 Ford Puma

To start off, 2007 Fiat Stilo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Puma (99 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2007 Fiat Stilo. (94 HP @ 580 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2007 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 52 kg more than 2003 Ford Puma.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Puma (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Fiat Stilo. (128 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Fiat Stilo.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Fiat Stilo 2003 Ford Puma
Make Fiat Ford
Model Stilo Puma
Year Released 2007 2003
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1368 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 94 HP 99 HP
Engine RPM 580 RPM 6150 RPM
Torque 128 Nm 146 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1090 kg 1038 kg
Vehicle Length 4190 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 45 L