2007 Ford C-MAX vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2007 Ford C-MAX is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford C-MAX (113 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 84 kg more than 1951 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford C-MAX (250 Nm @ 1850 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford C-MAX | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | C-MAX | Renown |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1850 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 19.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1368 kg | 1284 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |
