2007 Ford C-MAX vs. 1966 MG 1100
To start off, 2007 Ford C-MAX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford C-MAX (113 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1966 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1966 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 543 kg more than 1966 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford C-MAX (250 Nm @ 1850 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford C-MAX | 1966 MG 1100 | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | C-MAX | 1100 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1096 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1850 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1368 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |