2007 Ford C-MAX vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2007 Ford C-MAX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford C-MAX (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 537 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford C-MAX (155 Nm @ 4150 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford C-MAX | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | C-MAX | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2007 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4150 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |