2007 Ford C-MAX vs. 1968 Holden Monaro
To start off, 2007 Ford C-MAX is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Monaro (215 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2007 Ford C-MAX. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford C-MAX.
Because 1968 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Monaro (443 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford C-MAX. (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford C-MAX | 1968 Holden Monaro | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | C-MAX | Monaro |
Year Released | 2007 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 5354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 443 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2830 mm |