2007 Ford C-MAX vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2007 Ford C-MAX is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford C-MAX (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 682 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford C-MAX (155 Nm @ 4150 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford C-MAX | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | C-MAX | 102 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4150 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2160 mm |
