2007 Ford C-MAX vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird

To start off, 2007 Ford C-MAX is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford C-MAX (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (104 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 192 kg more than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford C-MAX (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Nissan Bluebird. (162 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2007 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Nissan Bluebird.

Compare all specifications:

2007 Ford C-MAX 1983 Nissan Bluebird
Make Ford Nissan
Model C-MAX Bluebird
Year Released 2007 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1973 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 134 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 162 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1362 kg 1170 kg
Vehicle Length 4340 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2560 mm