2007 Ford C-MAX vs. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2007 Ford C-MAX is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2007 Ford C-MAX. (113 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 102 kg more than 2007 Ford C-MAX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford C-MAX. (250 Nm @ 1850 RPM). This means 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford C-MAX | 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | C-MAX | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2007 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1850 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1368 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2730 mm |
