2007 Ford E-150 vs. 1968 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar 240.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Jaguar 240. (204 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 1968 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-150 | 240 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 54 L |