2007 Ford E-150 vs. 1978 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda Cosmo. 2007 Ford E-150 has automatic transmission and 1978 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1978 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Ford E-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 1978 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2007 | 1978 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |