2007 Ford E-150 vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (389 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01. 2007 Ford E-150 has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Ford E-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |