2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. Both 2007 Ford E-150 and 2004 Ford Mustang are equipped with a 4,605 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-150. (388 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford E-150 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | E-150 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 411 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 59 L |
