2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2004 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B2300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B2300 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B2300. (143 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B2300.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B2300. (209 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B2300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford E-150 | 2004 Mazda B2300 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | E-150 | B2300 |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Van | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 74 L |
