2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2004 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Murano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Murano would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Murano (245 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (389 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Murano. (334 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Murano.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 2004 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | E-150 | Murano |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 81 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 82 L |