2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2004 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Subaru Forester. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Subaru Forester would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (226 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2004 Subaru Forester. (162 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2004 Subaru Forester.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Subaru Forester. (225 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Subaru Forester.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 2004 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | E-150 | Forester |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 162 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 225 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |