2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2004 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Celica. (140 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Celica. (170 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 2004 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | E-150 | Celica |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 91 mm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |