2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2005 Ford Mondeo
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Mondeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Mondeo would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Ford Mondeo. (223 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Mondeo.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Mondeo. (281 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Mondeo. 2007 Ford E-150 has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Mondeo has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Mondeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Ford E-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 2005 Ford Mondeo | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-150 | Mondeo |
Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 59 L |