2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (525 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-150. (388 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 2005 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-150 | XJ |
Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 525 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 84 L |