2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2005 Mazda 3
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 2005 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | 3 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |