2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (212 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1311 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |