2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (153 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | Tribute |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2261 cc |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 62 L |