2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2008 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XK is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XK (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XK (420 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-150. (389 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 2008 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-150 | XK |
Year Released | 2007 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 71 L |