2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2007 Ford E-150 has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Ford E-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | 3 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 83.6 mm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |