2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2010 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2010 Nissan Murano is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Murano (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Murano. (336 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Murano.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 2010 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | E-150 | Murano |
Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 82 L |