2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford E-150 | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
| Make | Ford | Saturn |
| Model | E-150 | Outlook |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 277 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 253 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1990 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
