2007 Ford E-150 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2012 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mitsubishi Colt.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mitsubishi Colt. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mitsubishi Colt. 2007 Ford E-150 has automatic transmission and 2012 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Ford E-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-150 | 2012 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | E-150 | Colt |
Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 75.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 47 L |