2007 Ford E-250 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | E-250 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2007 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |