2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | E-250 | S60 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 93.2 mm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |