2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (209 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | E-250 | Dakota |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 91 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 83 L |