2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2004 GMC Safari
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2004 GMC Safari. (191 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Safari.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Safari. (339 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford E-250 | 2004 GMC Safari | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | E-250 | Safari |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Van | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 191 HP |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 102 L |
