2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | E-250 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 100 L |