2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. (210 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse. (278 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2004 Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | E-250 | Eclipse |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 278 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 62 L |