2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 225 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor. (339 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | E-250 | Endeavor |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 3835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 81 L |