2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (101 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | E-250 | Clio |
Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |