2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Matrix would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (123 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (161 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | E-250 | Matrix |
Year Released | 2007 | 2005 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 161 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 91 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 45 L |