2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star. (110 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star. (157 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2006 Mitsubishi Space Star | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | E-250 | Space Star |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 55 L |