2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75. 2007 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 2006 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 2006 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | E-250 | 75 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |