2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (415 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | E-250 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 415 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 87 L |