2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2006 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo XC90 (312 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo XC90 (441 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2006 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | E-250 | XC90 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 4408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 312 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5850 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 441 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |