2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (454 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | E-250 | Commander |
Year Released | 2007 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 454 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |