2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2012 BMW 760
To start off, 2012 BMW 760 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 5,972 cc (12 cylinders), 2012 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 760 (541 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 760 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 760 (750 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2012 BMW 760 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | E-250 | 760 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 5972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 541 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 750 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 5212 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1479 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 18.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 82 L |