2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2013 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2013 Chrysler 200. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2013 Chrysler 200.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chrysler 200. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chrysler 200.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2013 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Ford | Chrysler |
Model | E-250 | 200 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2121 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2765 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |