2007 Ford E-250 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (464 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (637 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-250 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | E-250 | CHARGER |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 464 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 637 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 72 L |