2007 Ford E-350 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2007 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-350 (476 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 418 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-350 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | E-350 | R2 |
Year Released | 2007 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 476 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Number of Seats | 12 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 30 L |