2007 Ford E-350 vs. 2004 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2007 Ford E-350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-350.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (553 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-350. (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-350 | 2004 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-350 | XJ |
Year Released | 2007 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5409 cc | 4193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 553 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 85 L |