2007 Ford E-350 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (347 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-350.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (520 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-350. (476 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2007 Ford E-350 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | E-350 | Commander |
| Year Released | 2007 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5408 cc | 5654 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 347 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 476 Nm | 520 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 12 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |
