2007 Ford E-350 vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-350.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (681 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-350. (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-350. 2007 Ford E-350 has automatic transmission and 2013 Jaguar XK has manual transmission. 2013 Jaguar XK will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Ford E-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-350 | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-350 | XK |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5409 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 503 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 681 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4794 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1322 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2752 mm |