2007 Ford E-350 vs. 2013 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2013 Nissan Armada is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Armada (313 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-350.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-350. (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2007 Ford E-350 | 2013 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | E-350 | Armada |
Year Released | 2007 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5409 cc | 5600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 313 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 475 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5276 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2014 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1981 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 105 L |